Too many leaders underestimate the importance of, and their role in, talent management. While it makes intuitive sense, it is now analytically clear that business leaders who are strong at talent management—being both committed and effective—get much better results. By focusing their talent management strategies and their own personal activities, the best executive talent managers generate as much as a 7% boost in revenue and profit performance over their less talent-focused peers. In addition, they achieve higher talent outcomes across-the-board, including employee effort levels that are 25% higher than average and markedly better retention rates (with less than one in ten of their employees at risk of turnover). Despite the compelling financial returns, Corporate Leadership Council (CLC) research shows that only 19% of senior executives are committed to, and effective at the talent management disciplines necessary to achieve these outcomes. We call those executives who do outperform “Talent Champions.”

The Business Case: Driving to Better Talent Outcomes Matters

Impact of Key Talent Management Disciplines on Business Revenue and Profit
Average Impact = 7% for Revenue, 6% for Profit

Image

Source: CLC Talent Management effectiveness Survey; Corporate Leadership Council research.

Executives Committed to and effective at Talent Management Outperform

Distribution of Business Leader Commitment and effectiveness

Image

Source: CLC Talent Management effectiveness Survey; Corporate Leadership Council research.

The Corporate Leadership Council compared the profiles, practices, and positions of Talent Champions against the average executive manager to understand Talent Champions’ distinguishing characteristics. Three important findings emerged:

Image Most executives have the ability.
Senior executives do not lack the ability to be better talent managers. In fact, almost all executives have the business acumen and management skills to effectively manage their human capital. The knowledge and skills most important to being a Talent Champion are also those most important to being an effective business leader: resource management, performance management, ethics, and inspirational communication. In summary, the highest returns on talent management come from approaching it like any other business challenge or priority. Executives yield the best results when they apply core business management skills to their talent management activities.

Business Leader effectiveness at Key Skills and Knowledge

Percentage of effectiveness

Image

Source: CLC Talent Management Effectiveness Survey; Corporate Leadership Council research.

Image Most executives lack the commitment.
The level of commitment to strategically managing talent management is the issue. Rather than ability, what distinguishes Talent Champions from their peers is their level of commitment to managing talent strategically as a top business priority. Talent Champions view their “people strategy” as a critical input into business strategy, ensuring these strategies are based on a strong talent plan that explains how staff will be developed, deployed, and enabled to meet business objectives. Unfortunately, many executives simply do not believe that having a strong talent strategy matters. In fact, most executives spend too much time on day-to-day talent management activities and not enough time on building the longer-term talent strategies their businesses require.

Image Getting better results does not require more time, just more focus.
Understandably, many executives worry that they cannot aff ord the time it takes to be an effective talent manager. Fortunately, getting better talent results is not a factor of time spent; Talent Champions spend no more time on talent management than less effective managers. What distinguishes Talent Champions is their focus on a narrower, more strategic set of talent activities; they focus on the right activities not simply more activities. In fact, Talent Champions frequently avoid the less scalable, employee-by-employee activities dictated by management conventional wisdom and rely on their organization and their HR generalist to give them leverage.